Hindi IAS100
ias100.in Official Website for Civil Services Chronicle
Perfection is not attainable, but if we chase perfection we can catch excellence.

Vince Lombardi

9582219047/ 9582219048/ 9582948810


Quick Contact

You are here: Daily Dose
Indias bits and protection of rights of tribals

Recently,  an investment treaty arbitration (ITA) claim was initiated   against India under the India-UAE Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) by Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority (RAKIA), an Emirati investor,  seeking compensation of $44.71 million. This happened after the cancellation of memorandum of understanding (MoU) between RAKIA and Andhra Pradesh to supply bauxite to Anrak Aluminum Limited, in which RAKIA has 13% shareholding, due to the concerns of the tribal population in the area. A similar issue arose in 2014 under Canada-Peru Free Trade Agreement wherein Bear Creek Mining Corporation initiated an ITA against Peru  for violation of the investment obligations  because mining concessions were withdrwan due to protests by indigenous peoples.  Besides imposing certain obligations on the host state, the BITs purpose is togive protection to foreign investors. Let us examine the  impact of the obligations under Bilateral Investment Treaties on the rights of the tribal people.

While at international level, India   is a party to the ILO Convention concerning the Protection and Integration of Indigenous and Other Tribal and Semi-Tribal Populations in Independent Countries, 1957.At national level, the Constitution  has provided for specialprovisions for development and governance of schedule and tribal areas under the Fifth and Sixth Schedules. The Forest Rights Act, 2006 also provides for protection of the rights of tribal and indigenous people  and their right to free and prior informed consent in event of their displacement and resettlement. But these provisions are regularly flouted as highlighted by the Xaxa Committee report of 2014. This indicates teh preference of state to fulfill contractual obligations towards the private investors while trampling over the rights of tribals. These foreign investments  have adverse impact on human rights issues of tribal people in BITs  and theer is exclusion of indigenous people from the policymaking process.

India should renegotiate the existing BITs and take adequate measures for protecting the rights of tribal people. The tribals ahould not be seen as impediments in the development process. And last but not the least, tribal people should be made a part of investment policymaking.

Share Button

Subscribe IAS100 Newsletter

  UPSC Daily Dose : Current Affairs
Government gave a go ahead to TN NEET ordinance
India keen on expansion of oil import sources
Economic Survey lowers growth forecast
Rationalising Subsidy, Centres expenditure framework
Upper house passed Banking Regulation (Amendment)Bill
Why AIJS is not a good idea
The deaths which shook Gorakhpur
ISRO set to launch Earth Observation Satellite
Hue and Cry around Article 35 A
Swachh Gramin Survey 2017, Bharat moving towards ODF
National Food Security Act lacks governance
States unwilling for stricter Anti-Racism Law
Government skipped procedure on Cattle trade ban
Clouds hover over Finance Act
Make in India needs Effective Implementation
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Terms & Conditions | Refund Policy | Delivery Policy | Disclaimer | Copyright Policy | Privacy policy |
Partner sites :  chronicleias.com | chronicleindia.in

Copyright © 2018 Cgmantra Digital Media Pvt. Ltd.


Please Give Your Valuable FEEDBACK To Serve You Better.

Please enter security code, displayed below !
(Note: code should be entered in small letters)