Last Updated: May 20, 2013  at 11:16:35 
Register Archives Site Map
Books Downloads
 
  • Social and Political Life - Class VII
  • Social and Political Life - Class VIII
  • Contemporary India Social Science for Class 9
  • NCERT Books India and Contemporary World 1 for Class 9
  • Economics - Class IX
Download more...
IAS Syllabus For PT
•   IAS Syllabus For PT
 
IAS Syllabus For Mains
 
View all 
Download Previous year Paper
  • IAS Previous Year Prelims 2012 Solved Paper
  • IAS Previous Year Paper Prelims-2011
  • IAS Previous Year Paper Prelims-2010
  • IAS Previous Year Paper Prelims-2009
  • IAS Previous Year Paper Prelims-2008
Download more...
Download State PCS Paper
 
  • AP-PCS 2012
  • UP PCS 2012
Download more...
Current Affairs Notes for PT 2013
Share
You are here: Polls
Current Poll
Do you think there will be better bilateral relations with Pakistan under Nawaz Sharif as Prime Minister?
  Yes
  No
  Can't say


Yes 72%
No 20%
Can't say 8%
Other Polls
Do you think judicial over-activism in India is diluting the demarcation between executive-legislature and judiciary and converting to judicial interference?
Yes 18%
No 79%
Can't say 3%
Anil, Hyd, 2013-05-13
It is moral obligation of all three organs to upheld the constitution. If an organ is not sincere about its duty, its responsbility can be honoured by some other organ provided it is an well thought decision and it doesn't happen frequesntly. In any case, public interest must prevail.
ABINASH TRIPATHY, BANGALORE, 2013-05-13
right approach to own work is matter.
DHIRAJ TAYAL, hyderabad, 2013-05-12
unearthing of scams after scams of unimaginable figure and repeated intervention by the government in its free and fair probe shatters the hope of a poor man in a democratic set up.thanks to the judiciary for standing up to the cause of common man.
Rizwan khan, gurgaon, 2013-05-11
in my opinion it's not.
Ram sharma, jaipur, 2013-05-10
no its not
Shashank, hyderabad, 2013-05-10
yes ,because more of now every statute is based on a sort of judicial interpretation ...this does not completely dilute the thin line between judiciary and legislature but does that up to an extent.laws ,acts framed my legis are now enacted.enforced stictly ..this is the reason y every case is referred to JUDICIARY whether at state or central level.
MANJUNATHA K, mandya, 2013-05-10
this very legislatue activites
Avdhesh, delhi, 2013-05-10
It right
Valan snow, 101, 2013-05-10
most of the politicians are behave like dog,so...
HARSH, Ranchi, 2013-05-09
my answer is no.
Niraj, Panipat, 2013-05-09
Governments over some decades are not performing their designated work. Parliament seldom runs smoothly and no healthy debate takes place. In this situation some institution should be there like SC to remind their duty or force Executive to work for the nation. Sometimes Judiciary crosses their line and enter into executive arena, that also need to be examined but its all happening due to paralysis of executive
Sandeep, faridabad, 2013-05-09
judiciary is just doing its duty to protect constitutional and legal rights given to citizens
DEVANSHU, AMDAVAD, 2013-05-09
judicial activism is healthy for our democracy but over-activism will increase coflicting zone between various organs of government
MITHILESHWAR SINGH R, bangalore, 2013-05-07
if executive and legislature are not working effectively..then it is the constitutional obligation of the courts to intervene in governance
AbinayaS, Madurai, 2013-05-07
I don't think so .. Judiciary maintains a steady balance between the legislature and executive .. it's necessary to maintain such system ..
MUZAMIL HAMID, KASHMIR, 2013-05-07
DEMOCRACY IN INDIA ONLY NAMELY
Jaya prakash mishra, bhubaneswar, 2013-05-07
judicial should be over powered
Vikramjeet singh, new delhi, 2013-05-07
judiciary is playing very imp role to make our democracy successful
Vinay Magotra, Udhampur, 2013-05-07
I Don't think so
Gaurav Singh, Ghaziabada, 2013-05-06
No There Is No Demarcation
Vishal anand, patna, bihar, 2013-05-06
Judicial over-activism is crucial and critical when thousands of cases are pending before the court.In a country like that of ours having exponential growth of population , the crime rate increases rapidly. Over activism would bring fear in the criminal mind and put a check over crimes. Moreover it would make the authorities and the law rakhwalas accountable. Our constitution strikes out the dominance of any one among the executive, legislature and judiciary over the other. Over activism is in no way the interference but more sense of responsiveness and degree to which the judiciary discharges its responsibility.
Avinash das, kolkata, 2013-05-05
yes it is good to interfere into some cases but over interference is going to infringe work of legislative and executive .
SHRUTI SINGHAL, Rajasthan, 2013-05-05
Judicial activism is somewhere a helping hand in strengthening the democarcy.
Divya pratap singh, amritsar, 2013-05-05
our judiciaries are at the pinnacle stage as per our constitution.When the appointmented body is not being considered as a performing individuality then there is no sign of interference in judicial matters.
Dalit Awaz, Delhi, 2013-05-05
Judiciary is giving right orders otherwise Politicians will even sell their mothers to remain in power.
Siddharth, varanasi, 2013-05-04
judiciary is the guardian of people of india and if any action of government causes irrationality , corruption then judiciary has right to interfare it.
Om pathak, noida, 2013-05-03
i dont think that judiciary interfere in the periphery of exeecutive legislature.there are some duty of judicary to maintain the balance in the sayastem.
Sac, hn, 2013-05-03
No, I think of it as opposite that the judiciary in India in present dark times is the last resort for a nation seeking redemption.
Hans Ram Meena, Jaipur, 2013-05-02
Because
T Sudarsa, Hyd, 2013-05-02
Nthg
Aman Pakhode, Mumbai, 2013-05-01
judiciary is there for balancing if executive using it's power in wrong way the judiciary has to intervene for welfare of people
Anindya acharya, Birbhum, 2013-04-30
Nothing to say
Hg, hoyg, 2013-04-29
no
Will the provisions of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Bill, 2013 be able to curb violence against women?
Yes 25%
No 71%
Can't say 4%
Gaurav Mangla, Mohali, 2013-04-28
More misuse seems to be happened in future
Anand raj, thane, 2013-04-28
See the problem lies more in implementation than in legislation.the policing in ours is old and outdated and no one is bothered to amend it .
Anand raj, thane, 2013-04-28
See the problem lies more in implementation than in legislation.the policing in ours is old and outdated and no one is bothered to amend it .
Gargi singh, delhi, 2013-04-28
The new should be able to set examples as to what can happen if a women is abused by the most stringent punishment in full public view. Plus not making life imprisonment for an acid attack is a big lacuna in the bill.
Uma sasidharan, India, 2013-04-27
No amount of bills can curb the violence its da patriarchy mentality that needs to be changed
Maddiramesh, vzmdist, 2013-04-27
no
M.ramesh, vzm, 2013-04-27
no
Ayushi ahuja, RUDRAPUR, 2013-04-27
IT CANT NAVER BE CURBED
Sushil kumar, patna, 2013-04-27
these crimes can be controlled by only through social awareness
Sandeep maan, kuk, 2013-04-27
amendment can't do anything until we follow it and this is same with our police system. this is only for diversion of people thinking
NIRAJ KUMAR, patna, 2013-04-27
as common mass of country are not aware of these rule®ulation so it hardly serve the purpose
Nagsen bhagavant dhavare, solapur, 2013-04-26
no. it is moral things
Sumit, jaipur, 2013-04-26
noep
Rashmi, Mysore, 2013-04-25
The (amendment)bill is not at all effecting any criminal.They are not afraid of the law as they will be knowing the loop holes of the laws.
SHUNMUGARAJ M, chennai, 2013-04-25
curtailment of crimes are largely depends on the concerned individuals' soul, first they should realize themself. this is only the way to minimising the crimes againts women and againts others
BASAVAKIRAN, BIDAR, 2013-04-24
IT WONT
Prateekgupta, new delhi, 2013-04-24
it will not curb violence
Dhiraj, Blore , 2013-04-24
No provision will help in curbing the violence against women until n unless our mind is set for nt to do so!!!
Pankaj chauhan, goa, 2013-04-23
yes,,,bcoz of that people will have fear in his mind...just bcoz of eveteasing he will go to 08 years of imprisonment...it enough to get rid of that issue....
Aman Pakhode, Mumbai, 2013-04-23
law enforcement is the main cause
Prasant Kumar, Rourkela, 2013-04-23
Mere amendments are not going to work as there are already provisions for the same and as always the result is on the -ve side.
Gayathri R Pisharody, Aleppey, 2013-04-23
to change the conditions of women, she should stand up & speak against this. no law could curb violence against women.
Abhishek, mumbai, 2013-04-23
we have to trust in our constitution & apart from the law, we, the people of India , have to respect our mother wife sister and daughter by our inner counciousness.
Dr. PREM PRAKASH OLA, sikar, 2013-04-23
अपराधी को फ़ासी पर लटकाओ.
Aftab, mumbai, 2013-04-22
sword without shield is dangerous.it will be more harmful for oblivion masses. we should empower women with social and economic tools and not with swords and knives.
Pujitha.G, madanapalle, 2013-04-22
Attacks against women and abuse can be mitigated upto some extent
Saba Hashmi, Vasundhra GZB., 2013-04-22
Yes, because there is need to make and implement stringent laws in our country to combat such henious crime.
Nagamalleswararao, vijayawada, 2013-04-21
please control wine shops,we want reforms in primary,higher education.Important thing is please vote for genuine persons.
Arunesh, bihar, 2013-04-21
india knows only to make laws but not to imply them. officers and court make responsible for the perfect implecation of law than only it is fruitful otherwise it just large the size of constitution nothing else
Sateesh, hyderabad, 2013-04-21
most of the sexual assaults in the country are done by alcoholic person, I think govt. should also bring some more reforms in liquor and alcohol prohibition.
Munish, J&K, 2013-04-20
we are doing nothing to changde the mind set of the people and tha is possible only when we apply some moral education in the curricullam of the earlier school days
Sruthi, bangalore, 2013-04-18
nothing gonna effect the indian ppl
Elaiyaraja, tamilnadu, 2013-04-17
Its not completely stopped by this act so we need more spiritual education .
Tapas sharma, Agra, 2013-04-16
i think it is good for woman safety but there should be a change in this bill.
Vinod kumar, India, 2013-04-15
This is not the solution yet.
Ajay Reddy Yeruva, Hyderabad, 2013-04-15
More Strict Laws should be implemented.
Naveen, kodangal, 2013-04-15
violence cannot br reduce by this law
Ashish Golchha, Raipur, 2013-04-15
No, because the thinking of the people have to be changed from grassroot level. People copmmiting these crime already know how serious this crime is and its consequences... so whatever the law is 1st thinking of the people should be changed..
Jitendra Kumar, India, 2013-04-14
see we already had very gud laws for such incident,but because of poor implimentations of the law makes it unuseful or simply irrelavent.policies must be made to aware the peopel about such laws.most of the people are not awre about such laws and account ofwhich this law was made that it will create fear but if people are not aware how it can worked?
Mohammed Moin, Guntur, 2013-04-13
There r always loopholes in every law which r exploited by crooks....
Om prakash, kanpur, 2013-04-13
it is part of human being every person want to safe and secure so that this bill is necessary to women
Suraj biskite, pune, 2013-04-12
provision of the criminal law will help to decrease voilation against women
Prabhat kumar singh, Mumbai, 2013-04-12
we need many amendment in law for curbing violence against women.
Abhishek Chowdhary, India, 2013-04-11
Nothing can be changed until proper education right from childhood and awareness programs inculcates a feeling of respect for women.
Anamika gupta, gorakhpur, 2013-04-11
yes
Hemant, Ahmedabad, 2013-04-11
Depend on what implementations and enforcement are applied.
Sanjeev, bhadohi, 2013-04-11
the provisions of the bill will not be able to fully curb the atrocities happening against women because in India rules are framed but due to poor administration it won't be implemented successfully.
Avinash, Mumbai, 2013-04-10
laws can only partially act as deterrence but cannot completely curb violence against women.
Harvilas Meena, Ahmedabad, 2013-04-09
I think that if this will take place then it will be able to curb violence against women
MANOJ KUMAR VISHWAKARMA, kharagpur, 2013-04-09
It is very important to respect women weather she is mother sister wife friend unknown or even enemy
Will the "Super Rich Tax" proposed in the budget increase the risk of tax evasion?
Yes 74%
No 24%
Can't say 2%
Prasanna Kulkarni, Aurangabad, 2013-04-04
The perspective evaders would be who earn just acrore or a little more than a crore. The govt should formulate clever policies to check evasion bu this group of people.
Ashish Mishra, India, 2013-04-04
We just have to look at Europe especially France and how it is forcing its super rich to move to other countries
Manjunatha k, mandya, 2013-04-03
this is a control of tax thifes
Ajit Pratap Singh, Noida, 2013-04-03
Increased tax burden on super rich class will motivate them to evade tax liability.
V SINGH, DWARKA, NEW DELHI, 2013-04-03
When super rich tax proposed in the budget then surely the risk of tax evasion will be increases.
Alok jain , Bareli dist-Raisen (M.P.), 2013-04-01
yes SRT will increase the risk of tax evasion.
Javed Iqubal, Delhi, 2013-03-30
Its a great step taken toward economic risk management by FM of India..
M.james rapha, nuzvid, 2013-03-30
yes
Rishi Raj Khandelwal, Madhubani, 2013-03-30
No one wants to pay more tax. so persons in super rich category will try to hide his/her real property and it will surely leads risk of tax evasion.
Mohan menaria, India, 2013-03-24
Now a days we have effective tax monitoring by using technology,so less chances of tax evasion
Reeti Mahobe, India, 2013-03-23
While this measure may aim to bridge the inequality gap, as in cases of big companies, it would lead to rise in tax evasion instances unless there's strong regulatory mechanism in place.
Prashanth Reddy, Karimnagar, 2013-03-22
Yes
Pankaj chauhan, goa, 2013-03-21
the finance minister P Chidambaram increased the surcharge (or tax on tax) for the rich whose yearly income exceeds Rs 1 crore. so in my opinion it is better as compare to last year...India is a developing country so it is necessary to take these type of decission for better development.
Shriniwas, pune, 2013-03-19
its right
Chandu, basar, 2013-03-17
i don't know
Ram, tuticorin, 2013-03-16
no
Abhishek kumar, visakhapatnam, 2013-03-16
When the tax rate increases, the evasion also increases.
Shailesh kumar, chennai, 2013-03-14
That the move will only affect existing taxpayers and result in further tax evasion.
Narendra Dhruwe, Korba, 2013-03-12
It will increase the risk of tax evasion.
Devi prasad, delhi, 2013-03-09
rich will evade more tax
ABHISHEK MEHATA, mirzapur, 2013-03-08
more u tax more they escape...
Md imteyazul haque, India, 2013-03-08
yes
Dilip kumar, delhi, 2013-03-06
its a good for knoeledge
Doondi rajesh, jangareddygudem, andhrapradesh., 2013-03-06
already there is evasion problem,with out finding the right answer for earlier evasion problem, how can government expect new rule will not violate? instead of new tax, government should put a more powerful mechanism to avoid tax evasion.most important thing is neo rich persons should learn minimum ethics then only the system will be perfect.
Khushnoor aqbal, boisar, 2013-03-05
i dont think so.if it happens then it will be disgusting for the elite class people to be not the nationalist nd in the favour of development of this country.
VINOD KUMAR, India, 2013-03-01
Think so
Divashri Mathur, India, 2013-03-01
The super rich tax applied as additional surcharge is only for a year and will not harm the rich. It therefore has little risk of tax evasion. It will increase government revenue and is a welcome move.
MAHMMADRAMIZ SHAIKH, Ahmedabad, 2013-03-01
wait 1 yr.
Manohar lal, hanumangarh, 2013-03-01
this is not a right way to increase the risk of tax evasion.
Is the hanging of Afzal Guru a Political gimmick or the need of the hour?
Yes 93%
No 5%
Can't say 2%
Nibu, new delhi, 2013-03-01
the long wait in taking decisions in clemency petitions have affected the common mans trust in judiciary, as somebody rightly said 'Justice delayed in Justice denied"
SANDIP SHIVAJI JADHAV, AURANGABAD, 2013-02-27
This could happen earlier also. It was need but already our politics is in point of view of public .Even public not could not knows but public knows everithing. So I think time is not right.
Pawan Dubey, Pune, 2013-02-26
It was just a instance by Congress for votebank and cope up with Opposition parties pressure
Lakshmiaknth, kadapa, 2013-02-26
yes
Bhanu, delhi, 2013-02-26
Respect Supreme Court verdict
ALOK KUMAR, NEW DELHI, 2013-02-26
IN TERMS OF INTERNAL SECURITY IT SEEMS A GOOD DECISION
Avinesh kishan, India, 2013-02-24
NO ,it is the strong message to the perpetrators who think India is a soft state
Pradeep, coimbatore, 2013-02-23
it is absolutely unnecessary to hang him now, that too just a month or two after hanging kasab. our govt. just wants to say that they are serious in dealing with terrorism, but they chooses a wrong way.instead our govt. can try to avert blasts like in hyd. But at the same time i am not saying afzal should not be met with capital punishment. i am saying its wrong time and also too late.
Tanveer , j&k, 2013-02-23
CONGRESS DID IT FOR UPCOMMING ELETIONS. THEY DO CARE FOR PEOPLE .AS WE SAW THEIR DECISION CREATED HOVOC IN KASHMIR.
Abhilash, hyd, 2013-02-21
its all vote bank politics
Chailesh galav, jaipur, 2013-02-21
yes
Vishnu, Chennai, 2013-02-21
What ever happened it's happened for Good finally.
Navanethakumar, Chennai, 2013-02-20
Its the time to harvest terrorism.Otherwise it will spoil our mother land.
Bhaskar chandra, delhi, 2013-02-20
if it was not a political stunt for the coming elections then it should be done earlier
Koyya sivaprasad yadav, visakhapatnam, 2013-02-19
absolutely it is a political gimmick to pacify the people and to earn more votes in 2014
Nitin, mangalore, 2013-02-18
As the upa govt at the central has no issues to show the public, to fight in the coming elections they need to take the other way, the hanging of kasab and afzal was in the minds of every indian who is against these terrorist. so why not they play this gimmick and fill the vote banks this way
Dhananjay jadhav, India, 2013-02-18
politics of death centence
Prudhvi, andhrapradesh, 2013-02-18
no
Jayakumar, salem, 2013-02-18
its right because if we do this definetely it will help to reduce the terrorist crime in our country
Bhuvana K, kochi, 2013-02-17
A very obvious political play that has once again grounded the nation's ethical values.
Hrudananda pallei, pune, 2013-02-17
people can understand the emotions of political parties.
Sruthi, bangalore, 2013-02-17
political gimmick
Yogesh, rohtak( haryana), 2013-02-16
becoz he escaped for many years then why should he hanged in 2005 almost
Alex, del, 2013-02-16
no
Ankit kumar, India, 2013-02-16
it will send a strong message to terriosts groups
Jitendra gupta, jhansi, 2013-02-15
surely a congress insignia of appeasement and opportunism...
Shubham gautam, New delhi, 2013-02-15
It is delayed already so it was need of the hour..
Abdulla, delhi, 2013-02-14
nothing
Vijaya, ghaziabad, 2013-02-13
yes at point of time congress need to wash his image get disrupted in recent times if not so then why now only
Rashmi, b, 2013-02-13
all can say dis s a need of hour but after long duration of execution is giving a glimpse of political gimmick
Ramesh sathe , Solapur maharashtra, 2013-02-13
Yes
Manigandan T R , Bangalore, 2013-02-13
Guilty persons should be punished or else it will spread like virus to our country
Sandeep Chandel, India, 2013-02-12
this is purely a political gimmick of Congress party to strengthen its stand on War against terrorism and defy opposition's allegations.
Piyush kumar, new delhi, 2013-02-12
It was need of the hour, every thing has been done according the rule and regulations as per the indian constitution.
As crime rate is increasing among juveniles, should their age be decreased to 16 years to enable giving harsh punishment for heinous crimes?
Yes 77%
No 22%
Can't say 1%
Rajesh Swarnkar, pune, 2013-02-11
Time has changed now. Even a 5 yr old child is much much smarter and clever than 10 yr old boy of 90s... A child at the age of 16 is wise to judge what is right or wrong. Just not because to punish a juvenile we should reduce the age, butalse this age reduction definitely required becuase person at 16 also doesn't like to be called as child adolescent
Is, hyd, 2013-02-10
As crime rate is increasing among juveniles, should their age be decreased to 16 years to enable giving harsh punishment for heinous crimes?
Divyanshu Kumar, Ranchi, Jharkhand, 2013-02-09
one who is doing such heinous crimes can't be a juvenile...bt only decreasing age limit is not the only solution. Youths are the future of our country and older ones have responsibility to teach them good things so that youths walk on the right path for the better development of our country 'INDIA'.
Abhishek srivastava, bhopal, 2013-02-07
only age is not the determining factor the psychologgy also matters
Raj Kumar, delhi, 2013-02-06
There should be reduction in the age of juvenile cases so a wide gamut of cases can be brought under sexual harassment.
Pranit, kolkata, 2013-02-06
specially it has to exmine the role of juvenile in such crime...if this crime has been done intensionaly...doesn't related to age... then he should be punished as per other adult criminals...
Vidya , hyderabad, 2013-02-06
juvenils who are involved in heinous crimrs should be punished.
N.VASANTH, chennai, 2013-02-06
The age limit for the vote should be 18 but in case of crime this should be as a16 so criminals wont able to escape from law in a name of miner(which they taking as a advantage). And capital punishment should be imposed, why mean many not afraid of Imprison due to they enjoy more benefit in prison more then an out.
Ellora Baliar Sinha, Chennai, 2013-02-05
If a human being is doing a heinous crime he will either be pshyco or cruel.No cruel and heinous person be called as juveniles as because of their age
P.PONNURU SRIKANTH, NELLOR, 2013-02-05
Sexual harrasments should be decreased in this country and should give special impatus to them
Prakash, Bangalore, 2013-02-05
This should not be happned again,because it leads freedom to do again for rapist/gangsters/criminals
MANIGANDAN, BANGALORE, 2013-02-05
We should not leave any culprit, if the harsh punishment is awarded then only the crime rate decreases.
Soumya, hyderabad, 2013-02-05
in the teen age the jeel to commite crime is more.
Shilpa sharma, noida, 2013-02-05
reducing the age is not a solution. however, we can define 'rarest of rare' or 'heinous' crimes category to give them stricter punishment
MITHILESH KUMAR, NIT DURGAPUR, 2013-02-04
SINCE THE MEDICAL AGE OF TODAY'S YOUNGESTERS DECREASE AS WELL AS IF HE/SHE IS ABLE TO DO CRIME THEN HE MUST BE QUITE ADULT TO MAKE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RIGHT AND WRONG.
Kishore, chennai, 2013-02-04
decreasing age to 16 will decrease alreadyprevalent crime rate among juveniles
Rakesh, Delhi, 2013-02-04
I agree
Karthik b.k., bangalore, 2013-02-04
child rights act come into force
SENTHILKUMAR, chennai, 2013-02-04
we can classify the crimes like theft,rape, murder,etc. based on crime type we can give punishment
Sangita, punjab, 2013-02-04
If a young person can do crime why he coul'd not be punished harshly.
Saurabh , new delhi , 2013-02-03
if they (juveniles)is doing brutal crime, then why there are exception for them in Law.
DHEERAJ , hisar, 2013-02-03
for heinous crimes, age must not be a matter to consider..now a days..even a 12 year knows how to fuck n all stuff..only our government is so lineant that's why..crime is increasing at blasting rate.. these kinds of accused should be hanged till death only irrespect of their age
Pia Mukherjee, kolkata, 2013-02-03
Giving punishment to a person depends on the intensity of the criminal offence..A person cud b underaged but that does nt decrease the impact or the harshness of crime..NO HEINOUS CRIME SUD B NEGOTIABLE ON THE EXCUSE OF AGE..
Rakesh kumar, new delhi, 2013-02-03
i think so if the juvenile is commiting a heinous crime as like rape means the subject has 2 much understanding , that' why sub has 2 be punished.
Anupriya, chennai, 2013-02-03
The juveniles are knowing everything even at the age of 16.So they should be treated and punished like adults.
Ravishankar, chennai, 2013-02-03
As you can see now-a-days media particularly entertainment media have exposed every thing that happens in society.One cannot say juveniles are immature to understand what they are doing
Ayan Mandal, Kolkata, 2013-02-02
A person Who is enough adult to rape someone,he is enough adult to be punished for such heinous crime..
Rajan Chaubey, ahmedabad, 2013-02-02
Yes, as with the advancement in all fields the brain of criminal has also started its execution early age so if we can except computer to the children so y cant we except punishments..
Jagadeesha, Mysore, 2013-02-02
crime is a crime,,,juveniles above 16 years age kows wat is right or wrong so age must be decreased,,,,,,,,because in feature juveniles may be used easily for crimes because of no punishment for them
BIKASH RAI, Assam, 2013-02-02
give death punishment....
Sourabh Tripathi, India, 2013-02-01
If ever this kind of incidence happens by the then juvenile, acc. to amended law(if we recently change the law), will we again decrease the age? No, there should be a special court of law or for some cases like the recent Delhi gang rape case, should be handled in a different and special manner. The juvenile accused in this particular case, is little less than 18. This is obvious that one cannot grow into an adult(thinking maturely) person in just a few months. The act that he has done shows the intesity of maturity and thinking, of a criminal, be it adult or juvenile. The mindset of both are at same stage of immaturity and lack thinking of probabilities of future.
Swati Jain, Chandigarh, 2013-01-31
A child's most delicate stage of life is aroung 15-16 years. Whatever he learns in this stage remians with him forever. So a educational revolution aimed at chanding the minsets/thinking of people along with reducing the age to 16 years, may probably reduce the rate of crime.
Dnyanesh N, B'lore, 2013-01-31
Finally crime is crime ,however age is not a matter in crime. because he did crime means he could understand what is wrong & correct
Shravani, Karnataka, 2013-01-30
Just to increase the punishment its not the right thought to decrease the age of juveniles.
Avinash Kumar Das, kolkata, 2013-01-29
As per our indian law Age 16 is a line which differ an adult to a javenials.The reason behind this 16 as a age is supproting by two factors.First is our belief that below 16 person is a child.And second part is physchological factor which tells us that a person below 16 is not mentally mature so that he can his decision right.As we fixed this age before 70 to 80 years back.but today above statements are not true.we cann't compare today 16 year age person to a 16 year person of 50year back.Due to change in enviroment ,technological innovation ,physchogical factors change.They are more accesseable to informations,knowledge. more knowledge implies more responsible and mature .so i think so today 16 year person has same maturity and responsiblity level comparing to 20 -30 years back adult person .so from my perspective we should have to lower down age limit like other western countries where 14 is the legal junevial age.
S.Sabthagirinathan, erode, 2013-01-29
the minors should not be punished since they do mistake only with the help of the majors , they don't have the chance to do wrong things by their own way
Bharat Varu, India, 2013-01-29
If they are doing "Heinous Crime" then it has nothing to do with AGE, SATAN should not be taken for granted only because he is JUVENILE
Shubhranshu Biswas, Gorakhpur, 2013-01-29
Definitely yes because it will restrict and reinforcethe youth below 18 years to commit such heinous crimes and it will also send a message that they cannot escape the punishment of a crime...Also if a juvenile is able to plan execute commit a crime deliberately being aware of the consequnces then it must be assumed that the juvenile has a mature and developed mind. If the juvenile has a well developeloped mind and has the ability to differentiate between moral and immoral act then the juvenile should also be prosecuted and tried for his/her offence.
Manish, chennai, 2013-01-28
if tomorrow 12 age child does crime, shall we ammend again juvenile justice act? Govt. has protected 0-6 yrs child under various schemes such as aangavaani,ICPS; 6-14 has been protected under RTE Act; but there is no schemes for the age 14-18 ye age. Weneed to look on it.
Jayalaxmi shetty, bangalore, 2013-01-28
At the age of 16 they are not still matured, and they are agile and impulsive.
Geetha, chennai, 2013-01-28
juveniles can be treated as juveniles only if their activities are so. now-a-days a juvenile commits a planned crime rather than unknowingly.
Shivakant pandey, mau,up, 2013-01-25
yes because the crime rate is increasing rapidly among the juveniles,this start from their home but initially no one mint about ther activity after that the do all wha they want....
Ravinder kumar, gurgaon, 2013-01-25
because to decrease the crime we need hard laws and also for fear in mind of juveniles.
Om prakash, kanpur, 2013-01-25
it is think of human feeling if you want to do some thing about in your society than you fallow +ve way than it is possible
Uday Kumar, Patna, 2013-01-25
It should be case based. There must not be a blanket No on punishment on the ground of juvinility. That means there should be an exception associated with Juvenile Justice act.
Srikanth, nalgonda, 2013-01-25
it is problem for age it is problem for that cruiality nature man
Ranjan Pandey, Bangalore, 2013-01-25
I think 16 year of age is more of an adolescent and less maturity,we should not judge it as a maturity act. Moreover, we don't have proper rehabilitation measures available to make the juvenile society ready after their imprisonment.
Ajay, Blore, 2013-01-24
Crime deserves no mercy .
MANISH KALAMKAR, achalpur, 2013-01-24
IT WOULD BE HASTY DECISION
NAVEEN GODARA, SUJANGARH, 2013-01-24
INSTD TO HARSH PUNISHMEN THEY MUST BE GIVEN MORAL EDUCATION
VINOD KUMAR, India, 2013-01-24
Juveniles have more crime against sex as they have more desires and passion for that.This is a personal opinion and nothing else.
Prakash, ranchi, 2013-01-24
no
Nagsen Meshram, Nagpur, 2013-01-24
Decreasing age is not the solution. a real awareness of all kinds among teenagers is necessary.
Manish pandey, dantewada, 2013-01-24
decreasing age is not the only solution. The victim who is committing crime should be socially and morally aware of crime which he or she is doing, because awareness is the best solution to stop such problems. hares punishment only punishsses his phisical body dosenot effect the soal.. Its my personal opinion that therse should be such mechanism for the younger generation not only in society and in jail or any other organisation where they are send,
SR KRISHNA, agartala, 2013-01-23
government should implement lessons regarding responsibility of humans for future survival
SR KRISHNA, agartala, 2013-01-23
government should implement lessons regarding responsibility of humans for future survival
Swati pani, 99, 2013-01-23
yes
Chandan sen, howrah, 2013-01-23
now many juveniles aged beteen 15 to 18 are being addicted to smoking,drinking alchohol,fithing with others and even phisical reletionship.if they are aware of that addiction,then they must have the feelings of their crimeness.so they should not be spared on ground of their juvenility.so their age should be decreased at least to 16 years so that they can be brought to book.
Home | About Us | Disclaimer | Contact Us | all india test center | Copyright Policy | Privacy policy | online | ias 2012 all india test series |
Partner sites :chronicleias.com | campus100.in | chronicleindia.in | cat100.in | cgmantra.in | chronicleacademy.com